On January 20 2013 the United States will be well on its way to determining who we will be as a country. On that day we will either be affirming the vision of the founding fathers of a nation following Judeo-Christian principles with a hope for life , liberty , and the pursuit of happiness or we will be a nation affirming that we want to replace a Sovereign God with a sovereign government. We will have realized our national slide away from its roots or we will sign onto a world view that is already crippling Europe and will do the same to us. On that day we will inaugurate a President for the next four years. If that President is Barack Obama then ideas planted in the last four years will be given roots so strong that it will be next to impossible to uproot them.
Readers of this blog know which vision I hope to see affirmed on that date. It is my dear hope that we will again be a country that acknowledges that every life is valuable because God created it and we will acknowledge that we are a free people whose freedom comes not from the consent of the government but from the grace of a loving God. I believe the ideological viewpoint, policies, and Supreme Court appointments of Barack Obama would be tragic for our country, not just for the next four years but for the entire future of the United States.
The question then becomes who should take the banner to lead us in this more historically consistent and positive direction. Once again readers of this blog will know that I have worked hard for the last 5 years to champion the cause of Mike Huckabee for that role. I do believe in miracles and would be thrilled if a brokered convention turned to the person who was leading in most major polls when he decided not to run. But politics being what it is, that would indeed be a miracle.
So in this primary season I have spent a considerable time, effort and research to explore each of the candidates that are currently in the field for the GOP nomination. I have sought to find the candidate with the character, experience and leadership qualities best suited to the enormous job at hand. In addition I have considered the factor of which candidate could most effectively go up against President Obama. I think using electability as the sole argument has brought us very poor candidates in the past and has rarely been accurate in terms of who in fact would be elected. John McCain was thought of as the maverick that would bring the independents to the cause. How did that work out?
However the issue of electability has been a major thrust of the talking heads for some time and what I consider the folly of their reasoning has brought me to this post. It is generally assumed that the candidate most to the center of the political spectrum will most likely garner the votes of the independents and thus win the election. With that rubric they have annointed Mitt Romney as the most electable. I believe rather that the independent voter who will tip the balance in the election will more likely turn to a candidate who is seen as competent, trustworthy and possessing a sincere personality than they will to someone who zigs and zags trying to appear to have a belief system appealing to whatever grtoup he is talking to in that given moment. I believe that the democrats would use the same argument that Romney's GOP rivals have used against him and would paint him as a flip-flopping out of touch rich guy who could not be trusted by either the right or the left and certainly not by the centrist looking for someone with a clear moral compass. They would have ample evidence to make the charge stick. Romney and Gingrich have bloodied themselves so much that their negatives have risen and the Obama team would certainly put a magnifying glass on those negatives. And Rick Santorum ? The charge is made that he would take away the freedoms and rights of all Americans in the name of his religious convictions. The truth is that his public record indicates that he has not done that. Rather he has made a bold public stand for what he believes in terms of issues such as the right to life and religious liberty and he has said that the government should not seek to meddle in such affairs by such practices as forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions.
Of the four candidates in the race I believe Rick Santorum is the most trustworthy of the group, the most likely to champion the cause of the sanctity of life, and the most electable Republican. Rick Santorum has earned my endorsement for President of the United States in this year's GOP primary. I hope January 20, 2013 will be a day we can all celebrate not only a new President but a renewed vision of America, a vision like that of our founding fathers.
Readers of this blog know which vision I hope to see affirmed on that date. It is my dear hope that we will again be a country that acknowledges that every life is valuable because God created it and we will acknowledge that we are a free people whose freedom comes not from the consent of the government but from the grace of a loving God. I believe the ideological viewpoint, policies, and Supreme Court appointments of Barack Obama would be tragic for our country, not just for the next four years but for the entire future of the United States.
The question then becomes who should take the banner to lead us in this more historically consistent and positive direction. Once again readers of this blog will know that I have worked hard for the last 5 years to champion the cause of Mike Huckabee for that role. I do believe in miracles and would be thrilled if a brokered convention turned to the person who was leading in most major polls when he decided not to run. But politics being what it is, that would indeed be a miracle.
So in this primary season I have spent a considerable time, effort and research to explore each of the candidates that are currently in the field for the GOP nomination. I have sought to find the candidate with the character, experience and leadership qualities best suited to the enormous job at hand. In addition I have considered the factor of which candidate could most effectively go up against President Obama. I think using electability as the sole argument has brought us very poor candidates in the past and has rarely been accurate in terms of who in fact would be elected. John McCain was thought of as the maverick that would bring the independents to the cause. How did that work out?
However the issue of electability has been a major thrust of the talking heads for some time and what I consider the folly of their reasoning has brought me to this post. It is generally assumed that the candidate most to the center of the political spectrum will most likely garner the votes of the independents and thus win the election. With that rubric they have annointed Mitt Romney as the most electable. I believe rather that the independent voter who will tip the balance in the election will more likely turn to a candidate who is seen as competent, trustworthy and possessing a sincere personality than they will to someone who zigs and zags trying to appear to have a belief system appealing to whatever grtoup he is talking to in that given moment. I believe that the democrats would use the same argument that Romney's GOP rivals have used against him and would paint him as a flip-flopping out of touch rich guy who could not be trusted by either the right or the left and certainly not by the centrist looking for someone with a clear moral compass. They would have ample evidence to make the charge stick. Romney and Gingrich have bloodied themselves so much that their negatives have risen and the Obama team would certainly put a magnifying glass on those negatives. And Rick Santorum ? The charge is made that he would take away the freedoms and rights of all Americans in the name of his religious convictions. The truth is that his public record indicates that he has not done that. Rather he has made a bold public stand for what he believes in terms of issues such as the right to life and religious liberty and he has said that the government should not seek to meddle in such affairs by such practices as forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions.
Of the four candidates in the race I believe Rick Santorum is the most trustworthy of the group, the most likely to champion the cause of the sanctity of life, and the most electable Republican. Rick Santorum has earned my endorsement for President of the United States in this year's GOP primary. I hope January 20, 2013 will be a day we can all celebrate not only a new President but a renewed vision of America, a vision like that of our founding fathers.



